Elderkin Law Firm
     
 
The Death of Medicaid Planning
 
     For the last 15 years, financial planners have assisted their elderly clients through the maze of issues relating to the ever-increasing long term care costs. With the stroke of a pen on February 8, 2006, President Bush signed into law the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (“DRA”). The passage of the DRA completely changes the landscape of Medicaid planning. This article will discuss those changes.

     The DRA made three major changes to Medicaid as it relates to long-term care costs. These changes are as follows:  

 

     (1)   Increase in the look-back period.  Prior to the DRA, Medicaid applicants needed to disclose all gifts made within the three years prior to applying for Medicaid. The DRA increased that look-back period to five years. This change may not seem all that substantial, but many long term care policies provide for the payment of benefits for a period of three years. Limiting the benefit payout period to three years made long term care insurance affordable for more people. With a three year benefit period, the insured could then dispose of his assets while being assured of the fact that he had sufficient assets to pay for his care during the entire look-back period. At the end of the look-back period the insured would be out of funds and would also be qualified for Medicaid. With the increase in the look-back period, long term care policies should be reviewed. If possible, those policy-holders should consider increasing the benefit period to five years.

An even larger impact will be in forcing individuals to attempt to see into the future for five years instead of three. With a three year look-back period it was possible, although difficult, to calculate the costs of long term care and make reasonable assumptions about the individual’s situation. The increase to five years will make that job more difficult and next to impossible when considered in light of the other changes discussed below.

     (2)   Starting date of ineligibility (“penalty”).   Prior to the passage of the DRA, the ineligibility or penalty period began on the date of the gift by a Medicaid applicant. For instance, if a Medicaid applicant made a $50,000 gift to one of his children on January 1, 2005, his ineligibility for Medicaid began on that date. His ineligibility for Medicaid was calculated by dividing a penalty figure (called the “penalty divisor”) into the amount of the gift. That penalty figure was adjusted annually and was equal to the average cost of nursing home care in Pennsylvania for that particular year. Under this example, the Medicaid applicant would be ineligible for Medicaid for a period of eight months following the gift. Therefore, by September 1, 2005, this applicant would be again eligible for Medicaid.

Under the DRA, the ineligibility or penalty period does not begin on the date of the gift. Rather, it begins on the date when that applicant is “otherwise eligible” for Medicaid. Effectively, this means that the applicant must be otherwise qualified for Medicaid by having depleted his funds and is a resident in a nursing home.

Changing the facts of our example above will illustrate the dramatic impact of this change. Let’s assume that our applicant makes a $50,000 gift on January 1, 2007. At the time of the gift he is healthy, living alone in his home and has another $50,000 available for his own use. On January 1, 2009, this applicant is hospitalized and is eventually admitted to a nursing home during the same month. During the next 8-9 months, he will deplete the $50,000 in additional savings that he had back in 2007 when he made his gift. His ineligibility period does not begin to run in January 2007 or even January 2009 when he is admitted to the nursing home. Rather, it will begin to run in September or October of 2009, after he has been in a nursing home for 8-9 months and after he has otherwise depleted his remaining funds. Under this example, his period of ineligibility would run from approximately October, 2009 until June of 2010.

This change in the starting date of the penalty period will effectively end “half-a-loaf” gifting. Half a loaf gifting was one of the primary tools that Medicaid planners used in helping elderly clients gift off property to their children. It allowed Medicaid applicants the ability to give away approximately half of their assets upon their admission to a nursing home.

     (3)   Cumulative gifts.  Prior to the passage of the DRA, generally each gift during the three year look-back period was viewed separately and penalty periods were assigned separately. With the passage of the DRA, all gifts and charitable contributions made during the five year look-back period will be totaled to assess one entire period of ineligibility. Therefore, seemingly innocent gifts such as assisting a child with a down payment on a home or larger charitable contributions will become part of the computation of this period of ineligibility. A Medicaid applicant might, for instance, make gifts to his children over that five year period totaling $20,000 and charitable contributions totaling $10,000. These innocent looking gifts and contributions will result in a period of ineligibility of five months. Moreover, this period of ineligibility will only commence after the applicant has been admitted to a nursing home and is otherwise eligible for Medicaid. Elderly couples and individuals having modest wealth will need to be concerned about the impact of these two changes to the Medicaid laws.

 

The changes wrought by the DRA will mean that elderly individuals will have to plan carefully for their long term care. Many individuals should consider or reconsider the purchase of long term care insurance. Any individual having net worth of between $50,000 and $1,000,000 should look carefully at the purchase of some form of long term care insurance. For an individual with a net worth below $50,000, the purchase of long term care insurance is probably not affordable. Conversely, for an individual having a net worth in excess of $1,000,000, even a long stay in a nursing home will probably not dramatically decrease his net worth.

Long term care insurance is similar to life insurance, meaning that, the earlier that it is purchased, the cheaper and more available it is. Individuals in their 50s should begin looking at long term care policies. Waiting until age 70-75 is similar to waiting until age 50-55 to purchase life insurance.

Lastly, the DRA does not change basic planning for couples where one of the spouses is about to be placed in a nursing home. A Medicaid planner can be extremely helpful in helping the community spouse navigate through this difficult time.

The above examples are only a small portion of this complex area. Please seek the advice of a competent attorney if you or a loved one is about to enter into a nursing home. It might not be too late to take some beneficial steps to preserve your financial health.

For an appointment to discuss any estate planning, pension, IRA or Medicaid, call John Enders or Tom Minarcik, at the Elderkin Law Firm, (814) 456-4000.

 

  


150 East 8th Street
Erie, PA  16501

 


 
 
 


Phone:  (814) 456-4000
Fax:  (814) 454-7411

 

© 2008 Elderkin, Martin, Kelly & Messina