|
|
The Death of Medicaid Planning
For the last 15 years, financial planners have
assisted their elderly clients through the maze of issues
relating to the ever-increasing long term care costs. With the
stroke of a pen on February 8, 2006, President Bush signed into
law the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (“DRA”). The passage of
the DRA completely changes the landscape of Medicaid planning.
This article will discuss those changes.
The DRA made three major changes to Medicaid as it
relates to long-term care costs. These changes are as follows:
|
(1) Increase in the look-back period.
Prior to the DRA, Medicaid applicants needed to disclose all
gifts made within the three years prior to applying for
Medicaid. The DRA increased that look-back period to five years.
This change may not seem all that substantial, but many long
term care policies provide for the payment of benefits for a
period of three years. Limiting the benefit payout period to
three years made long term care insurance affordable for more
people. With a three year benefit period, the insured could then
dispose of his assets while being assured of the fact that he
had sufficient assets to pay for his care during the entire
look-back period. At the end of the look-back period the insured
would be out of funds and would also be qualified for Medicaid.
With the increase in the look-back period, long term care
policies should be reviewed. If possible, those policy-holders
should consider increasing the benefit period to five years.
An even larger impact will be in forcing individuals to attempt
to see into the future for five years instead of three. With a
three year look-back period it was possible, although difficult,
to calculate the costs of long term care and make reasonable
assumptions about the individual’s situation. The increase to
five years will make that job more difficult and next to
impossible when considered in light of the other changes
discussed below.
(2) Starting date of ineligibility
(“penalty”). Prior to the passage of the DRA,
the ineligibility or penalty period began on the date of the
gift by a Medicaid applicant. For instance, if a Medicaid
applicant made a $50,000 gift to one of his children on January
1, 2005, his ineligibility for Medicaid began on that date. His
ineligibility for Medicaid was calculated by dividing a penalty
figure (called the “penalty divisor”) into the amount of the
gift. That penalty figure was adjusted annually and was equal to
the average cost of nursing home care in Pennsylvania for that
particular year. Under this example, the Medicaid applicant
would be ineligible for Medicaid for a period of eight months
following the gift. Therefore, by September 1, 2005, this
applicant would be again eligible for Medicaid.
Under the DRA, the ineligibility or penalty period does not
begin on the date of the gift. Rather, it begins on the date
when that applicant is “otherwise eligible” for Medicaid.
Effectively, this means that the applicant must be otherwise
qualified for Medicaid by having depleted his funds and is a
resident in a nursing home.
Changing the facts of our example above will illustrate the
dramatic impact of this change. Let’s assume that our applicant
makes a $50,000 gift on January 1, 2007. At the time of the gift
he is healthy, living alone in his home and has another $50,000
available for his own use. On January 1, 2009, this applicant is
hospitalized and is eventually admitted to a nursing home during
the same month. During the next 8-9 months, he will deplete the
$50,000 in additional savings that he had back in 2007 when he
made his gift. His ineligibility period does not begin to run in
January 2007 or even January 2009 when he is admitted to the
nursing home. Rather, it will begin to run in September or
October of 2009, after he has been in a nursing home for 8-9
months and after he has otherwise depleted his remaining funds.
Under this example, his period of ineligibility would run from
approximately October, 2009 until June of 2010.
This change in the starting date of the penalty period will
effectively end “half-a-loaf” gifting. Half a loaf gifting was
one of the primary tools that Medicaid planners used in helping
elderly clients gift off property to their children. It allowed
Medicaid applicants the ability to give away approximately half
of their assets upon their admission to a nursing home.
(3) Cumulative gifts. Prior to the passage of the DRA, generally
each gift during the three year look-back period was viewed
separately and penalty periods were assigned separately. With
the passage of the DRA, all gifts and charitable contributions
made during the five year look-back period will be totaled to
assess one entire period of ineligibility. Therefore, seemingly
innocent gifts such as assisting a child with a down payment on
a home or larger charitable contributions will become part of
the computation of this period of ineligibility. A Medicaid
applicant might, for instance, make gifts to his children over
that five year period totaling $20,000 and charitable
contributions totaling $10,000. These innocent looking gifts and
contributions will result in a period of ineligibility of five
months. Moreover, this period of ineligibility will only
commence after the applicant has been admitted to a nursing home
and is otherwise eligible for Medicaid. Elderly couples and
individuals having modest wealth will need to be concerned about
the impact of these two changes to the Medicaid laws.
|
|
The changes wrought by the DRA will mean that elderly
individuals will have to plan carefully for their long term
care. Many individuals should consider or reconsider the
purchase of long term care insurance. Any individual having net
worth of between $50,000 and $1,000,000 should look carefully at
the purchase of some form of long term care insurance. For an
individual with a net worth below $50,000, the purchase of long
term care insurance is probably not affordable. Conversely, for
an individual having a net worth in excess of
$1,000,000, even a long stay in a nursing home will probably not
dramatically decrease his net worth.
Long term care insurance is similar to life insurance, meaning
that, the earlier that it is purchased, the cheaper and more
available it is. Individuals in their 50s should begin looking
at long term care policies. Waiting until age 70-75 is similar
to waiting until age 50-55 to purchase life insurance.
Lastly, the DRA does not change basic planning for couples where
one of the spouses is about to be placed in a nursing home. A
Medicaid planner can be extremely helpful in helping the
community spouse navigate through this difficult time.
The above examples are only a small portion of this complex
area. Please seek the advice of a competent attorney if you or a
loved one is about to enter into a nursing home. It might not be
too late to take some beneficial steps to preserve your
financial health.
For an appointment to discuss any estate planning, pension, IRA
or Medicaid, call John Enders or
Tom Minarcik, at the Elderkin
Law Firm, (814) 456-4000. |
|
|
|
150
East 8th Street
Erie, PA 16501
|
|
Phone: (814) 456-4000
Fax: (814) 454-7411
|
|
|
© 2008 Elderkin, Martin,
Kelly & Messina
|
|